Sometimes it takes multiple reconnections to find the one server that unblocks your favourite streaming service. Regular Windscribe servers work too, but it’s not always guaranteed. With Windflix, you’ll only be able to stream in the four countries mentioned above. However, NordVPN has an advantage over Windscribe in the streaming realm, and it’s the higher number of locations and no need to switch servers when you want to access different streaming platforms. Streams loaded perfectly and no buffering took place. Meanwhile NordVPN has a feature called SmartPlay, which is specifically designed with streaming in mind.īoth NordVPN and Windscribe managed to unblock Netflix, DAZN, BBC iPlayer and Youtube without any problems. However, there are some tiny details such as server functionality and connection stability, and NordVPN works with Netflix and other streaming platforms better in this case.įirst of all, Windscribe has specialised servers for streaming called Windflix, located in US, Canada, UK, and Japan. We are glad to announce that both NordVPN and Windscribe perform really well when it comes to unblocking Netflix and other streaming platforms.
#WINDSCRIBE VPN REVIEW REDDIT DOWNLOAD#
In the download speed field NordVPN presents slightly better results than Windscribe, and Windscribe is faster with its upload speeds. If you wish to know more about Windscribe’s signature protocols, check out our Windscribe review.Īs for the last but not least protocol, IKEv2 seems to work pretty well with both NordVPN and Windscribe. OpenVPN TCPĪs mentioned before, Windscribe also has Stealth and Websocket Stealth protocols, but seeing as NordVPN doesn’t have them, there is no point in comparison. However, NordVPN takes the cake here, with its averages being twice as high as those of Windscribe. From both Windscribe and NordVPN’s average download and upload speeds, it is clear that TCP in general is not extremely fast. OpenVPN TCP protocols present a different story altogether. Windscribe now is blazing through, while NordVPN just barely catches up. The tables, however, turn drastically in the realm of upload averages. Windscribe, meanwhile, presents us with a huge 72% drop. Looking at the UDP download speeds, it’s clear that NordVPN is the winner here, retaining 65% of the original speed. Windscribe also has implemented two of their own variations, WStunnel and Stealth. Now, when looking at OpenVPN, both NordVPN and Windscribe use UDP and TCP protocols. Baseline for all speed tests: 300 Mbps download/300 Mbps upload.Additionally, there has been news that Windscribe is looking to implement WireGuard as their primary protocol. As for Windscribe’s WireGuard on Android, it doesn’t fall behind NordVPN that much, which is a welcome surprise. With the NordLynx protocol, we were operating on 63% of the original speed, and 43% of the original upload speed. Additionally, with Windscribe, WireGuard is available only for Android, which is a bit of a bummer. However, NordVPN’s signature NordLynx has a few tweaks here and there which makes it a bit faster than WireGuard. NordLynx and Wireguard protocols are pretty much the same. Both perform quite well with certain protocols, and equally worse with others. What we can tell so far is that Windscribe and NordVPN speeds are fairly similar to each other.
Nevertheless, counting the averages still allows us to fairly compare Windscribe and NordVPN’s speeds. It must be noted, though, that the speed of a VPN connection depends on a number of factors, such as proximity to the server and baseline speed. The performance of each VPN is compared by counting the average download and upload speed of each protocol.
0 kommentar(er)
